I understand the frustration. I regret that I made statements against the book without even reading it. Its popularity led to it getting unfair weight, so I understand the urge to correct that impression people are left with, many of whom don't or won't know much else about power exchange dynamics in a loving relationship, but I keep reading these posts about abuse and I'm reading that BDSM educators are leaving pamphlets for movie goers. It smacks of desperation. We're talking about a work of fiction. Fiction is different from real life, it's a representation, it can take any number of forms.
Here's a story Joseph Campbell told me. In an ancient human society, they used to bring out four or five virgin boys and one virgin girl. Under a rigged contraption of tree trunks, the boys would one by one have their first sexual relations with the girl. When the last coupling was in the act, the contraption would be sprung. The couple would be crushed, cooked, and eaten by the community. That's not fiction, that's true. So we have two choices when we hear that story. We can condemn that practice as barbaric, or we can consider it from a different perspective and recognize it as a need for those societies to make sense of what they think of the world through myths and through metaphorical enactments.
Fiction is a means of making sense of different things in a similar, much more innocuous way. If you see a relationship portrayed in a work of fiction and determine it to be abusive, you're not wrong but when you're telling everyone else they should find it abusive you absolutely are wrong, because you're putting your interpretation on other people. How do we expect anyone, maybe taking a risk by openly enjoying this book or this movie, to make sense of what they're experiencing through these fantasies enough to incorporate it into a real life enjoyment when they're being told they're doing it wrong before they even get started?
I doubt any practitioner of BDSM, however healthy and loving they feel their real life relationships are now or have been through the course of their adult lives, can say every fantasy construction of BDSM they've ever experienced in their minds would play out in real life in that same healthy and loving form. And even now I'm still playing that game of what's healthy and what's not. Who is to judge these things? It's never ceased to amaze me, since getting on fetlife--a site many people would judge shouldn't exist at all from their narrow perspective--the number of people who feel comfortable stating that this is acceptable but this isn't. This is a healthy relationship but this is abuse. We can't know what the experiences of other people are unless we are those people. Which isn't possible, so what's the point? And when people start in on fictional representations, they sound like people who don't have a grasp of the difference between fantasy and reality. And I don't mean to rant against them, because I understand why. They're protecting something that others have harshly judged. So, that's fine, but use this connection with people, this influx of interest, as an opening to communication instead of dishing out the same judgment.
Female Domination for Hopeful Romantics
Saturday, April 4, 2015
Sunday, January 25, 2015
The Story of My Two-Star Review
Let
me start by clearly stating that readers have every right to post what they choose
to post in reviews and how they choose to rate books they've bought and taken
the time to read. I would never and will never publicly comment on a reader
review.
Professional
reviews (and when I say professional I mean books received for free which leads
to compensation in the form of exposure for a review site and/or the reviewer
who in many cases is also an author with books for sale) ought to aim for a
high level of objectivity. This is a difficult skill to acquire. Anyone who's
had their work critiqued by fellow writers will probably tell you there are
some talented writers whose critiques are primarily focused on pointing out how
your work fails in being the story they wanted to read instead of how it could
be improved in being the story you wanted to write. Truthfully I'm not sure how
well reviewers accomplish this, I simply am aware the skill is difficult to
acquire and how rare it is among critiquers, which leads me to guess there are
reviewers who fail to meet a high standard of objectivity in reviews. As an
author of femdom novels, which are generally less comfortably received, I am
highly selective about sending my books out for review. I prefer to rely on
generous readers who bought copies wanting the kind of book they knew they were
getting and their reviews, which have been not numerous but favorable. I'd
rather do that than send books out for review that would land in the laps of
reviewers who would never by choice read a femdom novel, and then be left to
hope in their ability to review objectively a book not to their specific taste.
I
stumbled onto another option when I found a reviewer who stated in his review
policy that he only reviewed books he felt comfortable rating three stars or
higher. His stated reason was that it was a conflict of interest to rate fellow
authors' books poorly when he had books of his own for sale. An admirable
position, but for me it was appealing because it would prevent a reviewer
reacting negatively to the nature of the relationship between my dominant
heroine and her submissive lover, the portrayal of which is uncomfortable for
some.
I
contacted him with free review copies of both Courting Her and Serving Her,
books recently released in tandem by my publisher, Pink Flamingo. He messaged
back with a two-and-a-half star review, which included some legitimate criticisms
but primarily was a judgment of the characters under the guise of a review.
Kimberly was described as selfish, a psychopath, and I was told that the
characters should switch, occasionally, or the relationship they engaged in was
a form of abuse. He cited from Serving Her, the follow up book to Courting Her,
a part where Kimberly observes the dynamic between a neighboring couple,
perceives the man as too dominant in that relationship, and upon leaving a
visit with them informs Alex she needs to spank him to feel better.
The
reviewer defined feminism for me as equality between the sexes. If Kimberly is
meant to be a feminist, it's news to her creator, the author. She's a fledgling
female supremacist. She perceives misogyny in the world around her, is
frustrated by it, and punishes her male submissive lover to alleviate that
frustration. Is that fair? I would say no, it's not. I would say that's a flaw
in her. Probably so would Alex. Rather than decry her for it, Alex enjoys supporting
her by helping her work through it, by enduring punishments. Men enjoy women
inventing less valid reasons for delivering punishment for enjoyment's sake.
Alex is not complaining when Kimberly contrives reasons to punish him.
Kimberly
has a chip on her shoulder. I know that. Alex knows that. I find her more
interesting because of that; Alex finds her more courageous because she emerged
with that weight from a misogynist influence to become the dominant woman he
loves and adores, flaws and all. Now this reviewer caught that but rather than
consider what that meant about their relationship, he went straight to assuming
writer error. A reviewer completely airballing on the core interplay between
two characters in a book and then reviewing it poorly is unfortunate for
everyone and exactly what a review policy of only reviewing books if
comfortable enough to review them three stars or higher would have avoided had
the reviewer adhered to his own stated policy.
The
books individually did well enough, were enjoyed by enough readers, that my
publisher, Pink Flamingo, packaged them together and made them available at a
better value, combined, as Ebooks and paperbacks. The two-star review remains
attached to it despite my reminders to the reviewer about our agreed upon
arrangement. That's unfortunate but is unlikely to affect sales. The people who
are comfortable with themselves reading these books, the people who are comfortable
with themselves writing them, are fully aware that there are people who are
uncomfortable with them reading (or writing) these books and don't particularly
care, would prefer those people not act sanctimonious. They're aware that books
like this might have a poor review or two that aren't a reflection of the
books' quality but a reflection of the reviewers' bias. So the books will still
sell the same. They might lose one, here or there, which is sad. Sad for the
reader who might have found a book to love and sad for the writer who might
have lost an opportunity to connect with that reader. Reviews are meant to
connect us. That doesn't mean they all have to be good reviews, that wouldn't
work either, but they ought to be objective and in this case the review wasn't.
Worse
there are people who aren't fully comfortable purchasing and reading books they
enjoy on these subjects and are potentially upset by a judgment on their
reading tastes disguised as a review. Slam my writing and I'll keep quiet.
Attack my characters for their lifestyle and I'll defend them with everything
in me. By defining feminism he clearly revealed his bias that books should
portray his idea of feminism. It's hard to be objective but reviewers have to
be held to a standard so that they strive to write and post reviews void of
these judgments. When negative reviews lack objectivity and are essentially
rants against a certain lifestyle choice characters have made they're far
closer to a form of censorship.
(If
you don't think this happens, some time read some of the one-star reviews of
Freedom by Jonathan Franzen, arguably among the great prose writers of the day.
Most of them are complaints about the ideology presented in the book. Now a
complaint that a novel is too loaded with ideology is perfectly valid. A
complaint about a specific ideology is useless to include in a review; it's a
reviewer getting up on his or her soap box and spouting an irrelevant opinion,
a clear bias.)
Start
the review with 'This is a type of relationship of which I don't approve but'
and then when you're done take out the 'This is a type of relationship of which
I don't approve but' and hit post, because no one cares about your approval.
I'm
not making this personal. The reviewer will be easy enough to find as long as
the review remains posted. If he wants his name out of it, he can remove the
review. By his own review policy, it never should have gone up. I doubt he
will. He ignored my last message and unfriended me. He seems to have
successfully rationalized violating his stated review policy, for these books,
how I couldn't tell you. The explanation he gave me defied logic, in my
opinion. I certainly won't miss his friendship. I would like for him to have
kept his word and acted like a professional.
In
one of our exchanges he mentioned that he could maybe edit the review and go to
three stars. So was it two stars or three? Apparently three with my consent and
two without it. Clearly this shows a lack of integrity in the review. It
occurred to me that giving the go ahead to the three-star review would probably
lead to good exposure. A dominant woman being described as "too
selfish" is a fairly typical comment from a world deeply influenced by
misogyny, and would have been unlikely to deter femdom readers. It wasn't about
the stars, for me. Stars mean little. It was the biased attack on the
characters that led me to thank him for the time he put into reading the books
but that I thought we should move forward. I didn't want my books to become an
opportunity for a reviewer to get on a pulpit and preach against a lifestyle
some people engage in and enjoy and many other people enjoy having portrayed in
the fiction they read.
I
don't expect writers to be on my side on this. It's deeply ingrained in us to
keep quiet about reviews, but in this specific case, a clearly stated review
policy was violated, essentially it was a breach of contract. I won't be kept
silent by an internet bully. My concern is if speaking out hurts sales and my
publishers, who invest time and money making my books available to readers in
hopes of turning a profit to keep their business running. I'd be tempted to
keep quiet for them, but I answer to a personal code of ethics above all. And
the posting of this review was an injustice.
The
books in question can be found here, for sale on Amazon, in paperback and Ebook
form:
http://amzn.com/1938897471
Both remain for sale individually, as well, in only Ebook form. At the Pink Flamingo site, both are available individually in paperback and as Ebooks.
Thursday, August 14, 2014
Positions, Excerpt from The Lodge
Dominant women
making submissive men hold positions seems to be a common theme in my books. I
suppose that's no accident. That's a hot fantasy to imagine, choosing to obey a
command to hold to an uncomfortable position from a woman who, meanwhile, is
exercising free range of movement. I must not be the only one. My friend,
Mistress Lilyana, who authors an excellent blog, told me her post on positions
is one of her most popular. You can find that here:
http://www.mistresslilyana.com/2009/06/about-week-ago-in-my-favorite-fetlife.html
The Lodge is an
exotic dance club where patrons have the option of paying double price for
admission with a collar instead of a wristband. The entertainers carry leashes
and target collar boys for double price dances, which these men get to view
from their knees. To briefly set up this excerpt. Paul has become a valued
regular to his favorite dancer, Destiny. He arrives one night and Destiny isn't
there. He purchases a wristband, not wanting to be clipped by another dancer,
but disappoints Destiny by showing too much zeal at a night off her collar,
particularly making the mistake of hounding a cocktail waitress, Angela, into dancing
for him.
I’m
going to teach you a couple of positions.” She sat down and Paul knelt in front
of her. “The first we will simply call ‘The Position.’ If I say ‘assume the
position’ or if I snap my fingers or if I simply give you a look that says I
mean business all of that will mean I want you in this position.” She took her
paddle off her hip and moved it between his knees. “First spread them.” Paul
inched his knees apart until Destiny nodded. “Now clasp your hands behind your
back.” She stood up and moved behind him. “Get your butt up off your legs.”
Paul obeyed, though he shuddered at the vulnerability he felt as Destiny
touched the paddle to his backside. She moved back around and touched the
paddle to his shoulder. “Bend slightly over.” She sat down and crossed her
legs. “Now head up and look at me.” Paul craned his neck up and met her gaze.
She smiled. “There. That’s exactly how I want you. Take a moment to memorize
it.”
Paul considered his exact position. The
feel of his body, the way his quads strained slightly keeping his butt off his
legs, the slight tension in his neck from being bent forward with his head up.
The acute vulnerability of having his cock and balls hanging fully exposed as
Destiny’s heel swung in the air in front of them. “Now unless I say ‘at ease’
or make it clear that you have permission to relax or give another order, this
is how you’ll spend the evening. I’ll be inviting the other entertainers in and
displaying you to them. If I catch you covering up, I’ll be disappointed in
you.” She gave this a moment to sink in, that she and Angela would not be the
only women invited into the room. Paul felt a horror and resignation pass over
his face that Destiny appeared to notice and enjoy.
“Position two: Present.” She got up
and moved behind him. “Touch your cheek to the floor and get your butt in the
air.” Paul obeyed, but she caught him sneaking his knees together and
admonished him. Paul moaned as he spread his knees with Destiny just behind him.
“I know, it’s very humiliating, but is it much different from positions we’re
in while we dance? Get used to it while it’s just me and you, because the
entertainers who danced for you last week are all going to see you like this.”
“Destiny, please, I’m so sorry. Will
you please not do this?”
“Paul, I’m simply making demands and
you are capitulating to me. You may have your clothes back and exchange my
collar for a wristband at any time. You just have to say. Otherwise, I expect
obedience. Are we clear?”
“Yes, Ma’am.”
When creating
this fictional exotic dance club, I tried to include elements of realism, with
some club rules and with a focus on the dancers' income. I also took some
liberties. So would there really be a club where dancers could take men into
the champagne room and strip them naked? Yes! It's called The Lodge, and it's
the setting of a femdom novel by Gregory Allen. The Lodge is available in print
and as an Ebook at the Pink Flamingo website. The Ebook is available at amazon
and other Ebook retailers. Thank you for reading!
Saturday, June 14, 2014
New Release: The Lodge, excerpt from chapter one, "Clipped by Destiny"
The Lodge is an exotic
dance club where the dancers carry leashes and, for an extra fee, patrons can
enter wearing a collar instead of a wristband. The novel opens with Paul
finally working up the courage to visit his favorite dancer at the club wearing
one. The excerpt picks up just before Paul receives his first dance.
“Yes.”
The free amazon sample continues from here, I'll leave a link to it. The novel is also available in paperback at the Pink Flamingo website.
The sample is all of chapter one and a portion of chapter two:
http://amzn.com/B00K3B870G
Clipped by
Destiny, from chapter one of The Lodge by Gregory Allen
Destiny sat in the
middle of the couch between the other two and leaned back. She gave the leash a
sharp tug and pointed at the floor. Paul crawled to a stop and knelt up.
Destiny crossed her legs. She kicked her heel in the air between them. The view
up her tiny skirt revealed her bikini bottoms pressed between her tightly
closed thighs, but the glorious sight remained in his periphery. He couldn’t
remove his gaze from her face as she smiled down at him. “I wondered if you
would come in with a collar on. You seemed like the type.” She uncrossed her
legs and, placing both feet on the floor, leaned forward. She pinched his
cheek. “Were you too shy?”
“Yes.”
She leaned back,
drawing the leash tight, pulling him slightly off balance and making him tense
up. She raised her chin and glared down. “While you’re at the end of my leash,
you will address me as ‘Mistress Destiny.’”
“Yes, Mistress
Destiny.”
She smiled and let the
leash go slack. She crossed her legs, again. She told him she was enjoying the
change at the club. She was having fun with it. Several of her regulars were
coming in with collars on. Paul never liked hearing about her other regulars.
He didn’t have any delusions. Of course she was an entertainer and men came in
to see her, and it never bothered him to see her admired by other men she
danced for, but he did like to think she wasn’t anyone else’s primary reason
for coming in. When a dancer spots a man and knows when she sees him he’s a
certain yes for a dance a nice bond is created. He wished his sharing of that
with her was unique, but he obediently nodded along, listening attentively as
she continued speaking, her foot moving through the air just under his chin.
The usual chatter took
place. She let him know how her week had been and he told her about his. He
didn’t have a lot in common with a beautiful woman half his age, but with
Destiny, their surface conversations always felt sincere, and her wit and
intelligence, during these pre-dance chats, had always made it more amazing
that she would be dancing naked just for him and not slightly less the way it
could if a dancer seemed too vapid or uninterested during the conversation.
Now, on his knees at her feet, their pleasant, mundane chit chat took on a
heightened erotic charge.
A few other patrons had
been clipped by dancers, but the only two he could see on the adjacent couches
wore bands around their wrists and were sitting and talking with their
entertainers. Their forearms grazed against the dancers’ naked thighs. The
couples seemed focused on each other, but Paul still felt the embarrassment of
having to kneel while Destiny relaxed on the middle of the couch, her arms
sprawled across both cushions.
She chatted idly, as
though not even aware of the humiliation involved in his predicament, yet with
subtle looks and sly maneuvering of her feet, which stretched nearer and nearer
to his face, Paul could tell she was intentionally heightening his
embarrassment.
When the song began,
the dancers beside Destiny both rose. The men slid to the middle of their
respective couches and opened their legs, and the dancers centered themselves
between the knees of the men and began to slither out of their bikinis. Destiny
simply uncrossed her legs and leaned forward. “This is going to be fun.” She
cupped his cheek, grazing her palm against his skin, and pinched his cheek.
“I’ll take it a little easy on you.”
The free amazon sample continues from here, I'll leave a link to it. The novel is also available in paperback at the Pink Flamingo website.
The sample is all of chapter one and a portion of chapter two:
http://amzn.com/B00K3B870G
Sunday, March 16, 2014
Three Men and their Romance Writing
I
have this strange memory that surfaces when I participate in interviews. It's
from Beaches when Bette Midler's
character is watching herself on a talk show and answers to some question, all
dramatically, after begging herself from the couch to not go and say it,
"I would say that C. C. feels
things." Then the C. C. from the couch turns to the little girl and asks
what she thinks. The girls says, "I thought you sounded kind of
dumb."
That
haunts me! Although I also think Stephen King was onto something when he said
in On Writing, that if you're going
to agree to give an interview you have to have something to say. In my case,
I've been interviewed by generous people who gave me an opportunity on their
blogs, so short of making something up, (The example Stephen King gave in the
book was that he once lied and said he didn't write on Easter, Christmas, and
his birthday) which I wouldn't be comfortable doing, I attempt to push through
my comfort zone and offer something.
Which
isn't usually difficult for me, I have strong opinions, but I'm also quite
sensitive, especially on the topic of gender stereotypes and the effects of
sexism in the erotica writing world. As usual, I probably over stepped, but I was
fortunate for two reasons. The author of the article, PM White, did a great job
weaving my statements into a balanced article and because Willsin Rowe added a
fantastic point I missed. To my point that there are some sex-based biases in
the world of romance reading and writing that we would all benefit from having
cleaned up, a bit, he offers that it's a relatively, in the context of obvious
worse issues in the past, soft issue.
Saturday, March 8, 2014
To Write Books or to Play Video Games?
Is
"Keep Writing/Don't Give Up" advice you give?
Lately I find myself steering away from giving that kind of advice. When my writing friends post their frustrations (which seems to happen only occasionally, everyone seems to try and present a positive outlook), I like to offer encouragement but I'm more likely to say things like, "Try to focus on enjoying the work," if their complaint is about sales and reaching readers. I've reached a point where I feel like telling people to not give up and keep writing is a way of telling them that the book sales and the reaching readers they desire are just around the corner. And I worry that I might be presenting false hope. The reality is the readers most of us are hoping for probably aren't around the corner.
Lately I find myself steering away from giving that kind of advice. When my writing friends post their frustrations (which seems to happen only occasionally, everyone seems to try and present a positive outlook), I like to offer encouragement but I'm more likely to say things like, "Try to focus on enjoying the work," if their complaint is about sales and reaching readers. I've reached a point where I feel like telling people to not give up and keep writing is a way of telling them that the book sales and the reaching readers they desire are just around the corner. And I worry that I might be presenting false hope. The reality is the readers most of us are hoping for probably aren't around the corner.
What
I would really like to tell writers struggling with whether or not they want to
keep going is to take a quick break and consider if the joy and satisfaction
you get from sitting and writing, from doing the work, is enough to keep you
going by itself. If all those hopes and dreams of gaining readers and all that
might come with that were to go away, would you still write? The answer doesn't
have to be yes. Writers give a lot to the blank page and it's okay to want more
back, whether it's more communication with an actual person or financial
compensation for our investment of time.
I've
done this on numerous occasions and I always quickly come back to yes as my
answer, but that has to do with a lot more than just me as a writer, that has
to do with me as a person. I don't have a challenging day job, I'm not a
religious person, and these are two important holes in my life writing fills. I
also have the free time available to spend on writing. If I didn't write, I
might play video games. That's the analogy I often fall back on when I wonder
why I'm bothering when I'm feeling down about sales and gaining readers: I
could purchase video games and play them till I conquer them or I could write
books. Writing books, if nothing else, is cheaper.
Saturday, March 1, 2014
Femdom Symbols
A
friend asked me to read a story she'd written and comment. She apologized if
"writers get that a lot," which made me laugh because that marked the
first time I'd ever "gotten that." I was immensely flattered my
opinion was valued. She also warned me to not expect it to be "as
sensual" as my writing, which again flattered me. Then I read this story.
It was well written, but I knew it would be because I was familiar with her
blog and already knew she wrote well. The characters felt like they had a loving
relationship as they played. I was wondering what exactly she might have meant
when she said it wasn't like my writing. Then, near the end, the female
character (it was a femdom story) peed on her submissive male partner.
I
began writing femdom erotica for a few reasons, but one of them was that
reading femdom meant running into activities that either didn't turn me on or
that I didn't particular like that they turned me on. I "get"
enjoying getting peed on as an expression of submission to a partner, it just goes
a touch far, for me. In Serving Her, Kimberly tells Alex that peeing on him is
on their "list." Their "list" is a mutual one of activities
neither of them choose to participate in. It's mostly for Alex, since if
Kimberly didn't want to do something, she simply wouldn't, as she tells him.
But it's not a judgment against activities anyone else chooses to engage in.
Kimberly spanks Alex with all kinds of implements and snaps his cock with
rubber bands. Plenty of people would find that "a touch far" as an
expression of love between two people. How giant of a hypocrite would I have to
be to not recognize that getting peed on is simply another loving expression of
dominance and submission between people different from me?
And
she didn't mean, I don't think, that I would have an adverse reaction to that
scene, but it struck me that she thought I would find less love between them.
If two people whose tastes in femdom are close but don't quite sync up, can't
come together and recognize that the love is there, how can I expect vanilla
people to recognize that Kimberly and Alex share a love as strong as any two
people who don't engage in female domination? Only the symbols are different,
the love is the same.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)