I
began writing femdom erotica for a few reasons, but one of them was that
reading femdom meant running into activities that either didn't turn me on or
that I didn't particular like that they turned me on. I "get"
enjoying getting peed on as an expression of submission to a partner, it just goes
a touch far, for me. In Serving Her, Kimberly tells Alex that peeing on him is
on their "list." Their "list" is a mutual one of activities
neither of them choose to participate in. It's mostly for Alex, since if
Kimberly didn't want to do something, she simply wouldn't, as she tells him.
But it's not a judgment against activities anyone else chooses to engage in.
Kimberly spanks Alex with all kinds of implements and snaps his cock with
rubber bands. Plenty of people would find that "a touch far" as an
expression of love between two people. How giant of a hypocrite would I have to
be to not recognize that getting peed on is simply another loving expression of
dominance and submission between people different from me?
And
she didn't mean, I don't think, that I would have an adverse reaction to that
scene, but it struck me that she thought I would find less love between them.
If two people whose tastes in femdom are close but don't quite sync up, can't
come together and recognize that the love is there, how can I expect vanilla
people to recognize that Kimberly and Alex share a love as strong as any two
people who don't engage in female domination? Only the symbols are different,
the love is the same.
No comments:
Post a Comment